But why is not having to have Castle an advantage? Because you don't have to keep track of where another assembly sits on your computer? Unless how NH uses your dynamic proxy implementation affects how you write your other code or how it runs, what does it matter what NH is using under the hood?
On Apr 1, 4:13 pm, Sidar Ok <[email protected]> wrote: > One benefit is, for me from the real life, I use LinFu for all my other AOP, > and I don't have to have Castle DP2 anymore. > > Linfu also claims to be more performant than DP > (http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/LinFuPart1.aspx) . > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Joshua <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have too little understanding on the subject to suggest a specific > > dynamic proxy system. > > > On Apr 1, 3:42 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/4/1 jnoody <[email protected]> > > > > > What are some of the major benefits, otherwise? > > > > To work with lazy-loading NH need, so far, a Dynamic-Proxy system.Do you > > > have some advise about which one all users should use ? > > > > -- > > > Fabio Maulo > > -- > Sidar Ok > > http://www.sidarok.comhttp://www.twitter.com/sidarok --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
