2009/4/8 Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>

> 2009/4/8 Jan Limpens <[email protected]>
>
>>
>> I suppose, I would have to use a custom user type to de/serialize, but any
>> first hand experience would be a great help in avoiding pitfalls.
>>
>
> There is an existing type="Serializable"
>

That means I would have to use some binary serializable idictionary
implementation. will have to look into this...
Somehow I'd prefer xml serialization, but I might be wrong.

thanks for the follow ups!

--jan

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to