Thank you very much, Fabio! I am gonna try it tomorrow!

On 29 Apr., 09:11, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can use the statefull session and clean it after each action; the final
> result is the same.
>
> 2009/4/29 mscheibler <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Roger,
>
> > that's what I experienced. The question now is if there is any other
> > way to correctly insert the detail class including the foreign key.
> > The reason I am asking is that
>
> > A) from a DDD point of view I should never adjust my domain model to
> > overcome persistence restrictions
> > and
> > B) stateless sessions are bloody fast. Of course it would be possible,
> > but not desirable, to switch to normal sessions.
>
> > The interface IStatelessSession does not seem to give one the
> > opportunity to solve the problem.
> > If there is no other way, I am thinking about extending the interface
> > with something like IStatelessSession.InsertMany(object entity, string
> > manyProperty). Do you think something like that would word? If yes,
> > would you consider including into the trunk?
>
> > Michael
>
> > On 29 Apr., 09:40, Roger Kratz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > StatelessSession doesn't do cascade operations, AFAIK.
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> > Behalf Of mscheibler
> > > Sent: den 29 april 2009 07:57
> > > To: nhusers
> > > Subject: [nhusers] Re: IStatelessSession.Insert and uni-directional
> > one-to-many
>
> > > Again: anybody?
>
> > > On 28 Apr., 10:22, mscheibler <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi Fabio,
>
> > > > here are the mappings:
>
> > > >      <class name='TermsOfPaymentDetail'>
> > > >        <id name='_persistentId' column='Id' type='System.Int64'
> > > > access='field'>
> > > >          <generator class='hilo'>
> > > >            <param name='table'>UniqueId</param>
> > > >              <param name='column'>NextId</param>
> > > >              <param name='max_lo'>50</param>
> > > >            </generator>
> > > >          </id>
> > > >          <version name='_persistentLock' column='OptimisticLockId'
> > > > access='field' />
> > > >          <property name='Text' length='1024'>
> > > >            <column name='Text' />
> > > >          </property>
> > > >          <property name='PaymentTargetDays'>
> > > >            <column name='PaymentTargetDays' />
> > > >          </property>
> > > >          <property name='Discount'>
> > > >            <column name='Discount' />
> > > >          </property>
> > > >        </class>
> > > >        <class name='TermsOfPayment'>
> > > >          <id name='_persistentId' column='Id' type='System.Int64'
> > > > access='field'>
> > > >            <generator class='hilo'>
> > > >              <param name='table'>UniqueId</param>
> > > >              <param name='column'>NextId</param>
> > > >              <param name='max_lo'>50</param>
> > > >            </generator>
> > > >          </id>
> > > >          <version name='_persistentLock' column='OptimisticLockId'
> > > > access='field' />
> > > >          <list name='Details' cascade='all-delete-orphan'>
> > > >            <key column='TermsOfPayment' />
> > > >            <index column='Ordinal' type='System.Int32' />
> > > >            <one-to-many class='TermsOfPaymentDetail' />
> > > >          </list>
> > > >        </class>
>
> > > > Thanks for your help!
>
> > > > Michael
>
> > > > On 28 Apr., 07:08, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > mappings?
>
> > > > > 2009/4/28 mscheibler <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > Anybody?
>
> > > > > > On 27 Apr., 09:06, mscheibler <[email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hello,
>
> > > > > > > I have two entities, A and B, with A having a collection of B but
> > > > > > > WITHOUT B having a reference to A.
> > > > > > > Of course the database foreign key column is in table B:
>
> > > > > > > class A {
> > > > > > >   ICollection<B> Bs { get; }
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > class B {
> > > > > > >   ... // does not have reference to A
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > table A {
> > > > > > > ID int,
> > > > > > > ...
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > table B {
> > > > > > > ID int,
> > > > > > > A_ID int,
> > > > > > > ...
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > Now I want to import a lot of As and Bs using
> > > > > > > IStatelessSession.Insert. The problem is I can only add Bs to
> > A.Bs,
> > > > > > > but these are not inserted when I insert A. But when inserting B
> > > > > > > explicitly, A_ID always will have the value NULL.
>
> > > > > > > Is there a way to come around that problem?
>
> > > > > > > Thanks a lot!
>
> > > > > > > Michael
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Fabio Maulo- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > > > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to