Hi Sidar

Our idea was to load up the appdomain and get the config part done
with which also involves loading of assemblies which stay in memory
and are a resident of memory for application lifetime. So if i could
do this in another appdomain with some extra startup time and then
unload it I would be reducing some of memory footprint.

On May 4, 3:43 pm, Sidar Ok <[email protected]> wrote:
> Keep in mind the breaking changes from 1.2 to 2.1
>
> @codegoblin
>
> Can you expand on how you want to use config serialization to reuse configs
> in different app domain ? Is it that you only don't want to pay the cost of
> reading the config again upon each AppDomain creation ? I see a lot of
> problems with this approach if that's the case.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2.1 will be out, so I believe you can use it in your project and assuming
> > that your project takes some time till its release, nh will be out so it
> > shouldn't be a rpoblem.
>
> > Tuna Toksöz
> > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
>
> >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
> >http://tunatoksoz.com
> >http://twitter.com/tehlike
>
> > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:40 AM, codegoblin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Having said that is it a good idea to move towards NH 2.1 and use 2.1
> >> trunk code in production?
>
> --
> Sidar Ok
>
> http://www.sidarok.comhttp://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to