Also, I don't think stack vs. heap is an issue here at all, since structure is declared as part of reference type so it will live on the heap, not on the stack.
On Jun 17, 11:36 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > stack instead heap ? > > 2009/6/17 epitka <[email protected]> > > > > > If one creates a structure instead of class to represent a > > "component", then it can be mapped using "Map" instead of > > "Component" (Fluent NHibernate) > > syntax. It works for reads but I wonder if there are any concerns as > > far as updates are concerned, or anything else that might cause > > problems? > > -- > Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
