yeah, i'm not sure that's going to help:

http://j.otdown.com/15Jul09/5397zi/6e1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote:

> we would better help if you show some code and mapping, and maybe the sql
> output of your inefficient query.
>
> Tuna Toksöz
> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
>
> http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
> http://tunatoksoz.com
> http://twitter.com/tehlike
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Leonard Smith <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Wait... what would those options be?  I already had hql eager fetching
>> everything and performance wasn't sufficient.  I'm unaware of any other
>> option except to use sql in my hbm or c-sharp.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/7/15 Leonard Smith <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>> I have an object with a really deep hierarchy.   Retrieving this object
>>>> happens on every page of my application.  Some elements I need to display
>>>> are four or five levels deep.
>>>>
>>>> It was only recently that performance of this query started to
>>>> nose-dive... not that it was wonderful before, but tolerable.
>>>>
>>>> So, since I can't use return-join and load-collection in sprocs, is my
>>>> only choice to get performant sql really throwing in a few hundreds of 
>>>> lines
>>>> of sql in my mapping file or c-sharp?
>>>
>>>
>>> few info to advise you a way... but in general you have other 2 or 3
>>> options using NH.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fabio Maulo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to