FNH is serious way to mapping your entities and not "serious alternative to abstract NHibernate". Perhaps FNH does not do all you can do using mappings but you should change your mind from "map any specific" to "map by convention".
2009/7/31 spiralni <[email protected]> > > Hello pals, > > I am starting with Fluent for NHibernate, I have used ActiveRecord > with previous projects, but > to tell the truth I do not like to decorate my model with tags, > neither I like to write and maintain so many > xml files (as the project grows, it get harder) > > So my question is simple, > > Is NHFluent a serious alternative to abstract NHibernate? > > Which is the advantage of using xml over classes (or viceversa)? > > Does fluent classes do everything you can do with xml? > > Thanks > > > -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
