Thanks for the link Roger. If I understand the custom value type support correctly, it assumes that the columns necessary to 'hydrate' the value object class are all available on the table to which the containing entity is mapped. Is that correct? In other words, it doesn't look like the custom value type support deals with the situation where the columns for the value type live in another table. Is that how you understand it?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
