Forgot about the profiler question,

When i say duration i'm looking at the SQL:BatchCompleted row, which
with my limited SQL Profiler knowledge shows the time it took the SQL
to execute in the "Duration" field.



On 12 aug, 14:29, "F.B. ten Kate" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not running a specific test, i'm simply "implementing" in a quick
> dummy project, like i said this is to get used with NHibernate some
> and things. I can show you the two mappings that i have though.
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
> <hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2"
> assembly="NHibernate2" namespace="NHibernate2">
>         <class name="Debiteur" table="tbl_Debiteur" >
>                 <id name="Id" column="Debiteur_ID" type="Int32">
>                         <generator class="increment" />
>                 </id>
>                 <property name="Name" column="Debiteurnaam" />
>                 <many-to-one name="Entiteit" lazy="no-proxy" 
> column="Entiteit_ID"/>
>                 <property column="Sorteernaam" type="String" 
> name="Sorteernaam" not-
> null="true" length="80" />
>                 <property column="DatumWijziging" type="DateTime"
> name="DatumWijziging" not-null="true" />
>                 <property column="Actief_NeeJa" type="Int32" 
> name="ActiefNeeJa" not-
> null="true" />
>         </class>
> </hibernate-mapping>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
> <hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2"
> assembly="NHibernate2" namespace="NHibernate2">
>         <class name="tEntiteit" table="tbl_Entiteit" >
>                 <id name="Id" column="Entiteit_ID" type="Int32">
>                         <generator class="increment" />
>                 </id>
>                 <property name="Name" column="Bedrijfsnaam" />
>                 <bag name ="Debiteurs" lazy="true">
>                         <key column ="Entiteit_ID">
>                         </key>
>                         <one-to-many class="Debiteur"/>
>                 </bag>
>         </class>
> </hibernate-mapping>
>
> Here is my NHibernate config.
>
> <hibernate-configuration  xmlns="urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2" >
>         <session-factory>
>                 <property
> name="connection.driver_class">NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver</
> property>
>                 <property name="connection.connection_string">
>                         Server=server02;initial catalog=Directpay_Develop;User
> Id=XXXXXXXXXXX;Password=XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>                 </property>
>                                 <property name="show_sql">True</property>
>                 <property name="dialect">NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2005Dialect</
> property>
>                 <property
> name="proxyfactory.factory_class">NHibernate.ByteCode.LinFu.ProxyFactoryFactory,
> NHibernate.ByteCode.LinFu</property>
>         </session-factory>
> </hibernate-configuration>
> On 12 aug, 14:24, Sidar Ok <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Would you mind
>
> > 1 - Sharing the smallest bit that reflects the problem as a whole ( your
> > code under test, your tests, and mappings)
> > 2 - Running a code profiler and share the screenshot of it (to pinpoint the
> > bottleneck)?
>
> > And a question, when you are talking about the times in sql profiler, do you
> > mean it is the time *just* the query takes to execute ?
>
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:15 PM, F.B. ten Kate <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Ow, little extra info, it's 390000 Records i'm querying, which
> > > obviously is kinda alot.
>
> > > On 12 aug, 14:12, "F.B. ten Kate" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Like i said, the "timer" is in SQL Profiler. In otherwords not in the
> > > > code, but i also have the following bits in there to compare.
>
> > > >             DateTime start = DateTime.Now;
> > > >             IList<Debiteur> lijst = session.CreateCriteria(typeof
> > > > (Debiteur)).List<Debiteur>();
> > > >             DateTime stop = DateTime.Now;
> > > >             dataGridView1.DataSource = lijst;
>
> > > >             MessageBox.Show((stop-start).Seconds +"."+ (stop-
> > > > start).Milliseconds);
>
> > > > Meaning i start the timer AFTER the session has been created, and
> > > > start the "query" if i am getting this. the NHibernate project atm
> > > > takes 26 seconds to do this (this is with another enitity added with
> > > > Lazyloading, without this entitity it was +- 21 seconds) EF does the
> > > > same action in +- 5 seconds. Which leads me to believe the problem
> > > > lies in the execution of the SQL.
>
> > > > On 12 aug, 14:07, Paco Wensveen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > The sql is not executing slowly, the building of the sessionfactory is
> > > > > slow. Start your timer after buildsessionfactory and compare again.
>
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:01 PM, F.B. ten Kate<[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > Yes i am atm, since it's just a quit check to run a query, but would
> > > > > > this explain the SQL executing this slowly?
>
> > > > > > I know i'm not using any "best" practises and things, this is the
> > > > > > first thing im doing with both NHibernate and EF.
>
> > > > > > Here is the code running it.
>
> > > > > >            Configuration cfg = new Configuration();
> > > > > >            cfg.Configure();
> > > > > >            cfg.AddAssembly(typeof(Debiteur).Assembly);
>
> > > > > >            ISessionFactory factory = cfg.BuildSessionFactory();
> > > > > >            ISession session = factory.OpenSession();
>
> > > > > >            IList<Debiteur> lijst = session.CreateCriteria(typeof
> > > > > > (Debiteur)).List<Debiteur>();
>
> > > > > >            dataGridView1.DataSource = lijst;
>
> > > > > > On 12 aug, 13:22, Kim Johansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >> Are you creating a new SessionFactory each run? (SLOOOOOOOOOOOW!!!)
>
> > > > > >> You should use a single instance SessionFactory and just create new
> > > > > >> sessions.
>
> > > > > >> F.B. ten Kate wrote:
> > > > > >> > Hello there, im currently looking at some differences between 
> > > > > >> > both
> > > > > >> > ORM's and to get a good feel for both i try to query from one
> > > table
> > > > > >> > and simply drop all the data in a DataGridView.
>
> > > > > >> > Easy as pie right?
>
> > > > > >> > Now here is the different SQL's beeing generated
>
> > > > > >> > NHibernate:
>
> > > > > >> > "SELECT this_.Debiteur_ID as Debiteur1_0_0_, this_.Debiteurnaam 
> > > > > >> > as
> > > > > >> > Debiteur2_0_0_, this_.Entiteit_ID as Entiteit3_0_0_,
> > > this_.Sorteernaam
> > > > > >> > as Sorteern4_0_0_, this_.DatumWijziging as
> > > > > >> > DatumWij5_0_0_, this_.Actief_NeeJa as Actief6_0_0_ FROM
> > > tbl_Debiteur
> > > > > >> > this_"
>
> > > > > >> > Enitity Framework:
>
> > > > > >> > "SELECT
> > > > > >> > [Extent1].[Actief_NeeJa] AS [Actief_NeeJa],
> > > > > >> > [Extent1].[DatumWijziging] AS [DatumWijziging],
> > > > > >> > [Extent1].[Debiteur_ID] AS [Debiteur_ID],
> > > > > >> > [Extent1].[Debiteurnaam] AS [Debiteurnaam],
> > > > > >> > [Extent1].[Entiteit_ID] AS [Entiteit_ID],
> > > > > >> > [Extent1].[Sorteernaam] AS [Sorteernaam]
> > > > > >> > FROM [dbo].[tbl_Debiteur] AS [Extent1]"
>
> > > > > >> > Okay, so sofar EF wins in readability atleast but i dont intend 
> > > > > >> > to
> > > > > >> > actually look at the queries so i'm not worried.
>
> > > > > >> > I noticed that NHibernate was ALOT slower then EF, the reasons
> > > seemed
> > > > > >> > like a mistery to me so i ran SQL Profiler.
>
> > > > > >> > When i run the NHibernate project the query runs for a duration 
> > > > > >> > of
> > > > > >> > 19369 (milliseconds)
>
> > > > > >> > Then i run Enitity frame work which runs for a duration of 3621
> > > > > >> > (milliseconds)
>
> > > > > >> > (I clear caches between the different queries)
>
> > > > > >> > I then run the query in SQL Management Studio, The NHibernate has
> > > a
> > > > > >> > duration of 4291 (milliseconds)
> > > > > >> > I do the same for the Enitity framework which has a duration of
> > > 4291
> > > > > >> > (milliseconds)
>
> > > > > >> > Can anyone explain to me these durations? mostly the NHibernate
> > > time
> > > > > >> > when running it from application code is HUGE. Eventhough the SQL
> > > is
> > > > > >> > exactly the same...
>
> > --
> > Sidar Ok
>
> >http://www.sidarok.comhttp://www.twitter.com/sidarok
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to