Ricardo, You are missing a little bit of context. This issue has been beaten to death with a club. EF is able to achieve such performance because it does not tackle issues that NHibernate has as its primary concerns. (POCO)
Carefully, read Ayende's post along with the comments so you get more context. Also carefully read ORMBattle.net comments & blog so that you get a sense for how much this issue has been discussed. -Carlos Practice makes perfect, but if no one is perfect, why practice? > Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:49:33 -0700 > Subject: [nhusers] Re: Question about NH (Hydrate) performance > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > > Hi Fabio! > > I think that you are over reacting.... > > My intention is not make a critic to NH!!! > > By the contrary, I want to help and say that I like NH too much to > abandon it!!! I think that if EF can (as ORMBattle say, I've not > testet my self yet...) load 100K entities faster than NH, then NH must > do the same... > > This is my goal!!! Of course I understand that the architecture is > different, but as a NH user and fan, I think that this can be > possible. And as Obama said: YES WE CAN! > > Not put our hands down and say... NO, WE CAN'T !!!! > > I'm I wrong ? > > RP > > > > On 3 Set, 17:15, John Rayner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I also found that the most time consuming in the stateless session is > > > creating Proxies when the materializing is done. > > > > I may not be correct in this, but I think that lazy="false" on the > > <class> mapping prevents proxy creation. Have you tried adding this > > into all your mappings? (I'm not sure if your application needs lazy- > > loading at all). > > > > Cheers, > > John > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
