Yes, but that's about some other kind of private parts then C# fields... On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Fabio Maulo<[email protected]> wrote: > well... " Protect you private parts" does not sound so bad, no? > > 2009/9/3 Paco Wensveen <[email protected]> >> >> The slogan was "Don't expose your private parts" instead of Protect >> you private parts. >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Paco Wensveen<[email protected]> wrote: >> > The lack of incapsulation. You can not inherit this class and change >> > anything. This also means it cannot be proxied by NHibernate. >> > >> > Protect your private parts! >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Billy Stack<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> What is so strange about having a class like this: >> >> >> >> public class Entity >> >> { >> >> public readonly int Property1; >> >> public readonly int Property2; >> >> >> >> public Entity(int p1, int p2) >> >> { >> >> this.Property1 = p1; >> >> this.Property2 = p2; >> >> } >> >> >> >> Pretty common is it not? - immutability! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
