Fabio: I read about this (session-per-request and session-per-conversation) and chose the second for the "facility" of work flow. You say: "If you choose session-per-request you should choose another tech. to save partial invalid data in a "long" business transaction."
How i do it? i want to test this aproach. The isue that you point out i not can confirm because i never have pending actions more than edit recors. In this case, i try and the result is "the last win" aproach. And its fine for me. On Sep 15, 12:31 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > It depend.Mostly, and especially for high-level-traffic site, the best way > is open-session-in-view (aka session-per-request).If you > choose session-per-request you should choose another tech. to save partial > invalid data in a "long" business transaction. > > Have you confirmed the issue ? > > 2009/9/15 danyelleon <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > What way you recomend for implement session managemet of nhibernate in > > web enviroment? > > > Thanks, > > Danyel. > > > On Sep 13, 6:44 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/9/13 danyelleon <[email protected]> > > > > > i try. This work fine for me (the nhibernate part) > > > > mmmmm.... two tabs will share the same NH session, if you having pending > > > actions one flush will mean flush both use-case. > > > > -- > > > Fabio Maulo > > -- > Fabio Maulo- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
