You can also depend your cache providers on the user specific stuff. That some class should already be available in yourt code to put the username into session or something, i don't think this is a problem, is it?
Tuna Toksöz Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Niclas Pehrsson <[email protected]>wrote: > > It could be if DynamicConnectionProvider would use the WebSession > variable to point out the databasename. > Then DynamicConnectionProvider could use the WebSession to build the > session with the right databaseconnectionstring. > It will be kind of akward way to do it. Some class needs to be > responsible to put the right databasename in a websession with the > right key so the DynamicConnectionProvider can read it this isn't > obvious, but maybe the only way to do it. > > Im thinking about using OpenSession(IDbConnection dbConnection), more > visible. > > But I have something in my back head telling me that hasn't > SessionFactory something to do with second level cache or something > else that would make this a bad solution? > > On Oct 26, 10:53 pm, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does that solve your problem? > > > > Tuna Toksöz > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > > > > http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitter.com/tehlike > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > oh yeah > > > > >http://nhforge.org/wikis/howtonh/dynamically-change-user-info-in-conn. > .. > > > > > Tuna Toksöz > > > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > > > >http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz > > >http://tunatoksoz.com > > >http://twitter.com/tehlike > > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> I think He does but i couldn't remember the keywords. > > > > >> Tuna Toksöz > > >> Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > > > >>http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz > > >>http://tunatoksoz.com > > >>http://twitter.com/tehlike > > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Niclas Pehrsson <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > >>> It would be really nice if someone has a link to Fabio's solution, or > > >>> maybe he has it on his blog? > > > > >>> On Oct 26, 10:40 pm, Tuna Toksoz <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > Fabio has a better solution. I think it was implementing/extending > > > > >>> > NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider > > > > >>> > thing. > > > > >>> > Tuna Toksöz > > >>> > Eternal sunshine of the open source mind. > > > > >>> > http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksozhttp://tunatoksoz.comhttp://twitt... > > > > >>> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Jason Dentler < > > >>> [email protected]>wrote: > > > > >>> > > Niclas, > > > > >>> > > ISessionFactory.OpenSession accepts an IDbConnection. Using your > > >>> favorite > > >>> > > IoC framework, create a unit-of-work scoped connection to the > > >>> specific > > >>> > > customer's DB and pass it in to a single application-scoped > session > > >>> > > factory. I doubt this was the intended purpose, but it may work > > >>> anyway. I > > >>> > > would start there. > > > > >>> > > Thanks, > > >>> > > Jason > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Niclas Pehrsson < > [email protected] > > >>> >wrote: > > > > >>> > >> Hi I'm doing some research when using NHibernate with Multi > tenancy, > > >>> I > > >>> > >> have choosen to start with multi databases to solve the tenancy > > >>> > >> problem. One database per customer. We hope that our product > will > > >>> have > > >>> > >> several thousands customers, this will mean several databases. > > > > >>> > >> Now say that we will host this product and let the login of the > > >>> > >> customer decide which database to use for the user, then we need > to > > >>> > >> have thousands of SessionFactories in the server memory cause we > > >>> don't > > >>> > >> wanna build it each time a user requests for it. > > >>> > >> This will take a lot of memory, and some performance for the > > >>> > >> sessionfactory lookup, that has been a common solution to solve > this > > >>> > >> problem by the research I have seen so far. > > > > >>> > >> So is thousands of loaded sessionfactories a problem? or will it > be > > >>> > >> fine? > > > > >>> > >> Can a custom like implementation of a garbage collection be used > > >>> that > > >>> > >> throws out sessionfactories that hasn't been used for a time > solve > > >>> > >> this problem? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
