ah? take few minutes, perhaps after a break, and join this your assertions : - "Whenever I load an instance of A, I would like to load every child B." - "Table A and Table B are not related in the database." the OO translation sound as "class A is not related to class B in persistence" - "There are only a few records in Table B"the OO translation sound as : there are only few instances of class B - "and they need to be available to every instance of A for utility purposes"
That is not a <set> in the mapping but a static collection in your application. 2009/10/26 Matt Mangold <[email protected]> > > Domain Object: > > class A > { > public virtual ISet<B> ChildCollection { get; set; } > } > > Whenever I load an instance of A, I would like to load every child B. > Table A and Table B are not related in the database. There are only a > few records in Table B, and they need to be avaialable to every > instance of A for utility purposes. > > It appears that if I want to use a <set>, I have to specify a <key>. > Is there anotherway to map a <set> without having to specify the <key>? > > > -- Fabio Maulo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
