Use EntityMode.Map.
Here's a link:
http://nhforge.org/blogs/nhibernate/archive/2008/10/16/less-than-gof-is-hbm.aspx
<http://nhforge.org/blogs/nhibernate/archive/2008/10/16/less-than-gof-is-hbm.aspx>You'll
basically work with PropertyName/PropertyValue dictionaries, and no classes.

   Diego


On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 20:07, George Mauer <[email protected]> wrote:

> In this one case I think that I know what I'm doing...
>
> The DataReader would be good because in certain cases we will be
> pulling out a lot of data and simply displaying it in a WPF grid
> without applying much logic (or rather, there is a separate
> abstraction that applies logic).  Rather than draw out a data-reader,
> map to entities and then have the WPF grid consume those, it would be
> nifty to simply pass off the DataReader directly from a query.
>
> Why not just run SQL directly?  Because I have absolutely zero desire
> to handle caching and concurrency manually.  Oh and because this
> functionality has to be database agnostic.
>
> This is especially so because the domain model is completely up in the
> air.  The user defines what the tables and columns will be during
> runtime and we're actually going to go and create them behind the
> scenes.  Yes I'm not comfortable with this but there are several very
> good reasons why it should be this way.  We're going to use the
> dynamic-component mappings to achieve some of this.  What it means is
> since every "domain object" is going to be essentially an Id paired
> with an IDictionary it would be best to not have to worry about having
> these objects defined in code at all and only define them in xml where
> we can make changes by modifying the underlying mapping files in code
> and rebuilding the session factory.
>
> Yes this isn't quite what NH was meant for, but I'm willing to make
> the investment to bend it to my will if I can get caching, concurrency
> management, and db-agnosticism for free.
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 4:53 pm, "Cesar Sanz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Why do you need the DataReader?
> > Is it not better to utilize Entities?
> >
> > slts
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "George Mauer" <[email protected]>
> > To: "nhusers" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 2:41 PM
> > Subject: [nhusers] Is it possible to get at the underlying
> > DataReader/DataSet?
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I would like to get at the underlying DataReader or DataSet that
> > > NHibernate uses to populate its entities.  Ideally I would like to be
> > > able to do something like this:
> >
> > > DataReader customersReader = session.CreateQuery("from
> > > DynamicCustomers").DataReader();
> >
> > > Is this possible?
> >
> > > It would be better if I didn't even have an actual DynamicCustomers
> > > class, only the hbm mappings.
> >
> > > I'm not above forking the NH source to achieve this but I'm hoping
> > > that there's an extensibility hook I can use.  Can anyone point me
> > > down the right path?
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to