If you are not able to do development & testing on the exact same
configuration as your production environment then I would recommend using
Web Session, but again, only if you are experiencing performance issues that
require optimization - avoid premature optimization always.

John Davidson

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM, nadav s <[email protected]> wrote:

> if your okay with sticky session, something like the the current user could
> be saved in the in-proccess Session or System.Web.Cache
>
> IMO using the second level cache is great when you only need an object
> temporrarily, but the current user entity will surely be needed until the
> user's (web) session will die.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Quintin Par <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The medium trust app I run is on godaddy with Mysql access (they might
>> have added additional perms)
>>
>> I have made all the association eager fetched and it works fine.
>>
>> Will the 2nd level or any other NH cache work in this scenario?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:38 PM, John Davidson <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Medium trust applications do not normally have database access, unless
>>> that is an added modification to your trust implementation. Only SQL Server
>>> is supported in medium trust without policy modifications. Other databases
>>> require custom policy changes.
>>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms998341.aspx discusses the
>>> modifications required.
>>>
>>> http://nhforge.org/wikis/howtonh/run-in-medium-trust.aspx is a link to
>>> info about using NHibernate in a medium trust environment. The biggest
>>> change is the loss of lazy loading of associations, so you need to ensure
>>> your object model takes that limitation into account. Others may provide
>>> more detail if any of the NHibernate 2nd-level cache providers work in
>>> medium trust as that is not covered.
>>>
>>> Your options are 2nd-level cache from NHibernate (which probably requires
>>> custom policy for serialization of objects), ASP.NET caching (which
>>> again may require custom policy for serialization) or ASP.Net Session
>>> variables
>>>
>>> John Davidson
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Quintin Par <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oskarm
>>>> Are these caching startegies available for medium trust applications?
>>>> -Quintin
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Oskar Berggren <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Note that Get() or Load() doesn't matter for the case you describe.
>>>>> Get() will also return an already loaded object from the ISessions
>>>>> cache, if there is one.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Oskar
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2010/4/9 Quintin Par <[email protected]>:
>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > In my web application the master pagedoes authentication and loads up
>>>>> the
>>>>> > user entity using a Get.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > After this whenever the user object is needed by the usercontrols or
>>>>> any
>>>>> > other class I do a Load.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Normally nhibernate is supposed to load the object from cache or
>>>>> return the
>>>>> > persistent loaded object whenever Load of called. But this is not the
>>>>> > behavior shown by my web application. NHprof always shows the sql
>>>>> whenever
>>>>> > Load is called. How do I verify the correct behavior of Load?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -Quintin
>>>>> >
>>>>> > P.S. Cross posted at stackoverflow 4 days ago
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups
>>>>> > "nhusers" group.
>>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>>>>> .
>>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "nhusers" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "nhusers" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "nhusers" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "nhusers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to