On Apr 12, 2:51 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > This is my mapping > orm.TablePerClass<Client>(); > orm.TablePerClass<Party>(); > orm.TablePerClass<Product>(); > orm.TablePerClass<ClientOrder>(); > orm.Patterns.Poids.Add(new > ConfOrm.Shop.Patterns.PoidPropertyAsClassNameId());
That's fairly elegant - I'm impressed! Am I correct in thinking that this is your own enhancement to NHibernate, or does the basic NHibernate distribution support this? This is a slightly different approach to FNH automapping, in that you have to specify how to map a class (e.g. TablePerClass - I assume there are other pre-defined mappings as well). But in practice, it seems it would be equally convenient. Are you saying it would work with Brand's classes as he defined them? If so, that's very nice - not having to make any changes to your domain classes to support the ORM. If I wanted to evaluate this approach, how would I get started? -Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
