First I cant see it in the profiler. Second I have a Test which varifies
that all objects are loaded per join. And when I first started the
testrunner for the many-to-one assiciation the test doesn't failed. The test
looks like:

Child child = new Child();
Parent parent = new Parent();
praent.Child = child;

using(ISession session = sessionFactory.OpenSession){
    session.Save(child);
    session.Save(parent);
}

Parent result:
using(ISession session = sessionFactory.OpenSession){
    result = session.CreateCriteria<Parent>()
       .Add(Restrictions.Eq("Name", "myName"))
       .UniqueResult<Parent>();
}

Assert.That(parent.Child, Is.EqualTo(child))

With the query above the test should fail because the session was closed.


2010/4/19 Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>

> How are you determining that lazy loading isn't happening?
>
>    Diego
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:44, Armin Landscheidt 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hallo
>>
>> I'm loading an Object with a many-to-one association. When I load the
>> parent-object I would expect that the child is loaded lazy. But the
>> child ist loaded directly. How can this be? Is there a default which
>> could be set or something else?
>>
>> The mapping is like this:
>>
>> <class name="Parent" table="Parent" dynamic-update="true" lazy="true"
>> >
>>        <id name="Id" unsaved-value="0">
>>                <generator class="native" />
>>        </id>
>>        <property name="Name" not-null="true" />
>>        <many-to-one name="Child" column="ChildId" insert="false"
>> update="false" not-found="ignore" />
>> </class>
>>
>> <class name="Child" table="Child" dynamic-update="true" lazy="true" >
>>        <id name="Id" unsaved-value="0">
>>                <generator class="native" />
>>        </id>
>>        <property name="Name" not-null="true" />
>> </class>
>>
>> The Query:
>> var parent = session.CreateCriteria<Parent>()
>>        .Add(Restrictions.Eq("Name", "myName"))
>>        .UniqueResult<Parent>();
>>
>> The properties are all virtual. If not NHibernate would throw an
>> exception.
>> Does anyone know a reason why the child is not lazy loaded?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "nhusers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>
>>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to