The answer is yes and you need to write some code. http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2009/07/nhibernate-fluent-configuration.html
If you like the answer "No" there is no problem. On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Graham Bunce <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks for the opinions. > > Yes, I'd thought of both of those options already. However my > extension is to NHibernate behaviour, i.e. If this configuration > setting = true then extend NHibernate so that it does not perform > implicit dirty checking (as per the NH Add Ins process Fabio wrote) > otherwise use the default behaviour of NH (something that would be > nice in NH 3.0.0 tbh). > > When you consider therefore that this is an explicit change to how NH > works in our application framework, it makes sense to include that in > the configuration of NH as that is where a developer will look. > > I could create a custom configuration block but, until now, we haven't > needed one and IMO actually makes things *more* complicated, not less, > to do so. > > So, thanks for the feedback but I guess the answer is actually "no, > you can't" but it seems a shame that you cannot override the > appriopriate methods in Configuration to do this. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > -- Fabio Maulo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
