Oops. Wrong post. This is the one:

http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2010/01/16/eagerly-loading-entity-associations-efficiently-with-nhibernate.aspx

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Jason Dentler <[email protected]>wrote:

> This may help:
> http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/04/27/nhibernate-futures.aspx
>
> Without your mappings and query, we really can't tell you more.
>  <http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2009/04/27/nhibernate-futures.aspx>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Dor Rotman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Consider this scenario: I need to query for employees, and:
>> 1. Each employee has a collection of addresses, each address has a
>> collection of phone numbers.
>> 2. The query must run as fast as possible, since I'm focusing on the
>> performance aspect now.
>> 3. Paging should be supported.
>>
>> Right now there are no lazy properties, since all objects will
>> eventually be serialized via WCF.
>> So each object returned from the query sends NH to do lots of
>> roundtrips to the DB, to populate all collections.
>>
>> If I do an eager fetch on everything, I get a Cartesian product, and
>> then need to run the DistinctRootEntityTransformer. As far as I know,
>> it does not affect the SQL statement, but rather works on the returned
>> CLR objects. Therefore paging will not work well, because some records
>> from the returned result set will be ignored. Additionally, it came to
>> having 5500 rows returned for 270 entities, before running the
>> transformer. This is due to the Cartesian product.
>>
>> How can I optimize the current implementation? Is there any way to
>> make less DB roundtrips while still being able to page properly? (and
>> not loading a whole lot of CLR objects to memory?)
>>
>> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dor Rotman.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "nhusers" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to