session.Query<T> is new in 3.x, using the integrated Linq provider, which is
HQL-based instead of Criteria-based behind the scenes, allowing for more
flexibility.

   Diego


On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:13, ben <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fabio,
>
> Is session.Query<T> new?
>
> Using what you have with session.Linq<T>:
>
>            var query = from v in _session.Linq<Vehicle>()
>                        where v.Carrier ==
> _session.Load<Carrier>(carrierId)
>                        select v;
>
> Generates the same sql as what I have in the my original Linq example:
>
> NHibernate: SELECT this_.Id as Id1_1_, this_.VehicleType as
> VehicleT2_1_1_, this_.BusinessRef as Business3_1_1_, this_.CarrierId
> as CarrierId1_1_, carrier1_.Id as Id2_0_, carrier1_.Name as Name2_0_,
> carrier1_.BusinessRef as Business3_2_0_, carrier1_.Enabled as
> Enabled2_0_ FROM Vehicles this_ left outer join Carriers carrier1_ on
> this_.CarrierId=carrier1_.Id WHERE this_.CarrierId = @p0;@p0 = 1
>
> Thanks
> Ben
>
> On Jun 23, 12:38 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > from v in session.Query<Vehicle>() where v.Carrier ==
> > session.Load<Carrier>(1) select v
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:16 AM, ben <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I've got a one to many association between a Carrier and Vehicle. In
> > > my database my Vehicle table has a foreign key CarrierId.
> >
> > > The most efficient way to query vehicles by carrier would be:
> >
> > > select ... from Vehicles where Vehicles.CarrierId == 1
> >
> > > However, if I use QBC:
> >
> > >                var fromDb = session.CreateCriteria<Vehicle>()
> > >                        .CreateCriteria("Carrier",
> > > global::NHibernate.SqlCommand.JoinType.InnerJoin)
> > >                        .Add(Expression.Eq("Id", 1))
> > >                    .AddOrder(new Order("BusinessRef", true))
> > >                .List<Vehicle>();
> >
> > > The result is:
> >
> > > NHibernate: SELECT this_.Id as Id1_1_, this_.VehicleType as
> > > VehicleT2_1_1_, this_.BusinessRef as Business3_1_1_, this_.CarrierId
> > > as CarrierId1_1_, carrier1_.Id as Id2_0_, carrier1_.Name as Name2_0_,
> > > carrier1_.BusinessRef as Business3_2_0_ FROM Vehicles this_ inner join
> > > Carriers carrier1_ on this_.CarrierId=carrier1_.Id WHERE carrier1_.Id
> > > = @p0 ORDER BY carrier1_.BusinessRef asc;@p0 = 1
> >
> > > If I use NHibernate.Linq:
> >
> > >                var fromDb2 = session.Linq<Vehicle>()
> > >                    .Where(x => x.Carrier.Id == 1)
> > >                    .OrderBy(x => x.BusinessRef)
> > >                    .ToList();
> >
> > > The result is similar but always seems to do an outer join (how can I
> > > force it to be left inner?):
> >
> > > NHibernate: SELECT this_.Id as Id1_1_, this_.VehicleType as
> > > VehicleT2_1_1_, this_.BusinessRef as Business3_1_1_, this_.CarrierId
> > > as CarrierId1_1_, carrier1_.Id as Id2_0_, carrier1_.Name as Name2_0_,
> > > carrier1_.BusinessRef as Business3_2_0_ FROM Vehicles this_ left outer
> > > join Carriers carrier1_ on this_.CarrierId=carrier1_.Id WHERE
> > > carrier1_.Id = @p0 ORDER BY this_.BusinessRef asc;@p0 = 1
> >
> > > Finally if I use HQL (as much as I dislike using "magic" strings), the
> > > result is exactly what I would expect and seems the most efficient:
> >
> > >                var fromDb3 = session.CreateQuery("from Vehicle where
> > > Carrier.Id = :id")
> > >                    .SetParameter("id", 1)
> > >                    .List<Vehicle>();
> >
> > > NHibernate: select vehicle0_.Id as Id1_, vehicle0_.VehicleType as
> > > VehicleT2_1_, vehicle0_.BusinessRef as Business3_1_,
> > > vehicle0_.CarrierId as CarrierId1_ from Vehicles vehicle0_ where
> > > vehicle0_.carrier...@p0;@p0 = 1
> >
> > > So why do I get this difference and more importantly, how can I use
> > > QBC or Linq to generate the same SQL as HQL does?
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ben
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to