@Peter
Maybe this will help:
http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2006/06/05/NHibernatesAssociationIsCool.aspx
It's a bit dated but I guess it's still relevant.

@Diego
Nothing in particular, Diego. I don't know much about db/nhib performance,
but from what I hear, having as many relationships as that design suggests,
on the most frequently used tables, might cause performance issues. And,
IIRC, I read somewhere that when working with inheritance queries should be
given more thought than 'regular' queries, and that design would have
inheritance everywhere. Why chose design that implies more thinking? :)
<any> seems much more simple. Again, that's what I remember hearing/reading
and isn't necessarily true, so... Feel free to educate me ;)

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Kenneth <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, as Fabio wrote, use the <any> tag
>
> /K
>
> On Jul 13, 7:37 am, Peter Forstmeier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > i follow this thread because i'm very interested on the same subject.
> > I didn't see any solution right now. Did i miss something.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> > On 12 Jul., 13:53, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Uh?
> >
> > > What performance problem are you worried about exactly?
> >
> > >     Diego
> >
> > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 22:50, Vekaz Turković <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > Thank you Diego, I was afraid this will end up unanswered :) That was
> one
> > > > way I considered doing it, but there's also Activities who are,
> > > > relationship-wise, the same as notes. Both Notes and Activities will
> most
> > > > probably hold a lot of data. I am afraid that, with so many
> relationships,
> > > > performance might become an issue pretty soon. Would it be possible
> to use a
> > > > denormalized database; Note would hold type and id of the entity it
> is
> > > > attached to?
> >
> > > > On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Diego Mijelshon <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > >> This was discussed last month (
> > > >>
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers/browse_thread/thread/973df7dce...)
> > > >> and it is certainly on topic :-)
> >
> > > >> In short: the model is simple. Several classes have a collection of
> notes
> > > >> (or, more precisely, a List, because the order probably matters).
> You could
> > > >> create an interface (IHaveNotes) to deal with this in your code and
> make it
> > > >> easy to add/retrieve notes from any entity.
> >
> > > >> Then, you have at least two possible ways to map this:
> > > >> - Note is a component type, there is one table per Notes collection
> > > >> - Note is an entity, there is one table for the Notes and a
> many-to-many
> > > >> table per each collection, mapped with cascade="all-delete-orphan"
> >
> > > >> Note that the data implementation should NOT change your model. It's
> > > >> always an IList<Note>.
> >
> > > >>     Diego
> >
> > > >> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:01, moohzor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >>> Hi,
> >
> > > >>> This isn't strictly nhibernate related, but I thought this would
> still
> > > >>> be the right place to ask.
> >
> > > >>> I have a Note entity, related to almost all other entities (you can
> > > >>> attach a note to pretty much anything else). All these entities
> have a
> > > >>> property to hold a collection of notes (but notes don't have to
> have
> > > >>> reference to the entity they're related to). I don't know how to
> best
> > > >>> model this in the database and map in hbm. How would you do this?
> >
> > > >>> Thanks in advance.
> >
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > >>> "nhusers" group.
> > > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> ­>
> > > >>> .
> > > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > >> "nhusers" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> ­>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > > >  --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > "nhusers" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> ­>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.-Zitierten Text
> ausblenden -
> >
> > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to