HQL syntax proposal ?

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, that would be great.
>
> On Jul 13, 9:01 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > what I mean is thishttp://
> fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2009/05/oh-beautiful-sql.html
> >
> > <http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2009/05/oh-beautiful-sql.html>We may
> create
> > a new HQL-syntax to achieve the same for SELECT queries
> >
> > Proposals ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I didn't realize this was possible. Are you saying that I can create
> > > the temp table in my SP, and then reference it in an HQL or Criteria
> > > query?
> >
> > > On Jul 12, 9:54 pm, Vadim Chekan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > No, the funniest part is this:
> >
> > > > > This worked great until  .. hit the limit of allowed parameters in
> SQL
> > > Server 2005
> >
> > > > Mike, you need to predict how your code will work even before you
> > > > wrote it. how much data is going to be retrieved, how many ID are
> > > > going to be pushed back to sql, how much all this will take in RAM,
> > > > etc.
> > > > And always run sql profiler to see what your code is doing actually,
> > > > otherwise it is source of horror stories :)
> >
> > > > I would rather keep SP as SP. Leave data managing task to SQL Server,
> > > > it is good with it. Without knowing details of your application, I
> > > > would try to modify existing SP so that besides select, it creates a
> > > > temporary table with selected IDs. Then you can select your related
> > > > objects as "select * from MyRelatedObjects where ID in (select ID
> from
> > > > #temp)".
> > > > As a bonus you avoid ID roundtrip which will improve speed.
> >
> > > > Vadim.
> >
> > > > On Jul 12, 8:00 am, José F. Romaniello <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > This is the funny part:
> >
> > > > > 2010/7/12 Mike <[email protected]>
> >
> > > > > > At this point I do not have a business case to
> > > > > > rewrite this Stored Procedure using NHibernate
> >
> > > > > If this is not a "business case to rewrite the sp with NH", then
> you
> > > will
> > > > > have to change your SP.....
> > > > > forget about selecting with a list of ids.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to