Hi people! I didn't use ConfORM yet... You know, Fabio, Coto Effect (private joke... ;-)
But, I understood one point, please, correct me Fabio if I'm wrong: You can use ConfORM to map classes to something relational, inferring or explicit mention table per concret class and other options.... AND at the end, YOU CAN use NHibernate OR NOT. You can inject other ORM solution, or your own. I don't remember the interface to implements, but it is possible. I think that is a new twists in ConfORM. Other topic: I found ORum as ORunMapping very confusing to me. I had not seen any UN-Mapping, only a mapping in other way. I guess Fabio would say "file mapping", "XML mapping" or something alike. Angel "Java" Lopez http://www.ajlopez.com http://twitter.com/ajlopez On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > ConfORM is the result of a vision. > You can read the introduction and the original motivation here: > http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/02/conform-nhibernate-un-mapping.html > > ConfORM is the result of "landing a dream": ORuM > ORuM = Object Relational unMapping > would be very nice to have a domain-model and let a bot chose its > representation a to a RDBMS or a NoSQL system. > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > That still tells me that it tries to solve the same problem >> > Fluent >> > NH tries to solve too: a typed way to map classes to tables for >> > the >> > NHibernate framework. >> > >> > >> > Perhaps... >> > as MsTest, xUnit, MbUnit tries to solve the same problem of NUnit as C#, >> > Vb.Net, Delphi... tries to sole the same problem of Java as Ninject, >> > Funq, >> > Castle, StructureMap, Autofact tries to solve the same problem of Spring >> as >> > EntityFrame4, LLBLGen, and others tries to solve the same problem of >> > Hibernate as MacOS, Windows, Unix, Umbutu, Suse and others tries to >> > solve >> > the same problem. >> > and this is only a very partial and minimal representation of the >> situation >> > we are living >> >> Ok, let me try it one more time, differently this time: is ConfORM >> an option used by a lot of people using nhibernate or is this the plan of >> the NH team, over FluentNH/XML? >> >> It's about what the NH framework is 'recommending' as the >> 'preferred' approach. I don't care what your personal preferences are in >> this, I just want to know what's the preferred way and what it will be in >> the future (e.g. NH3). If they solve different problems, then it's not a >> way >> of 'you have to choose between A and B'. As they look like they solve the >> same problem, it is a matter of 'you have to choose between A and B', and >> thus every A and B is relevant, unless it's either someone's pet/hobby >> project or a project which is dead for a long time. >> >> FB >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "nhusers" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Fabio Maulo > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
