Well okeay thanks,I have tested and seen that around 100 is quite good for performance
On Aug 12, 2:56 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > Niclas: Using FNH you can define your default, for all your collection, in > one place (using a convetion). > > You can do the same even with default NH's configuration setting the > property default_batch_fetch_size > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:10 AM, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Niclas: Generally there's no need to change the batch size setting > > unless you're doing performance optimisations. It's the old "premature > > optimisation" thing, if you aren't feeling any pain from the default > > setting then you don't need to change it. > > > On Aug 12, 12:17 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Niclas Pehrsson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > May there be any standard batch size that are prefered? for an ms sql > > > > database? > > > > Yes, you can use your preferred. > > > -- > > > Fabio Maulo > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "nhusers" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > > -- > Fabio Maulo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
