> ConfORM is the result of a vision.
> You can read the introduction and the original motivation here:
> http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/02/conform-nhibernate-un-mapping.html
>
> ConfORM is the result of "landing a dream": ORuM ORuM = Object Relational
> unMapping
couple of questions, as I'm confused now:
- the blogpost refers to a dev discussion which starts with a question about
what to with this with respect to NH3. Does this mean that the NH team
pushes confORM for NH3? I ask this because if that's the case we need to add
support for it in llblgen pro when NH3 ships
- it seems confORM stays somewhat close to the XML. I find that odd,
considering that the xml design for nhibernate (coming from hibernate) is
sometimes inconsistent and very confusing.
> would be very nice to have a domain-model and let a bot chose its
> representation a to a RDBMS or a NoSQL system.
what do you see as the 'domain model' then? A bucket of C# code? I
hope not.
FB
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > That still tells me that it tries to solve the same
> problem
> > Fluent
> > NH tries to solve too: a typed way to map classes to tables
> for the
> > NHibernate framework.
> >
> >
> > Perhaps...
> > as MsTest, xUnit, MbUnit tries to solve the same problem of NUnit
> as C#,
> > Vb.Net, Delphi... tries to sole the same problem of Java as
> Ninject, Funq,
> > Castle, StructureMap, Autofact tries to solve the same problem of
> Spring
> as
> > EntityFrame4, LLBLGen, and others tries to solve the same problem
> of
> > Hibernate as MacOS, Windows, Unix, Umbutu, Suse and others tries
to
> solve
> > the same problem.
> > and this is only a very partial and minimal representation of the
> situation
> > we are living
>
>
> Ok, let me try it one more time, differently this time: is
> ConfORM
> an option used by a lot of people using nhibernate or is this the
> plan of
> the NH team, over FluentNH/XML?
>
> It's about what the NH framework is 'recommending' as the
> 'preferred' approach. I don't care what your personal preferences
are
> in
> this, I just want to know what's the preferred way and what it will
> be in
> the future (e.g. NH3). If they solve different problems, then it's
> not a way
> of 'you have to choose between A and B'. As they look like they
solve
> the
> same problem, it is a matter of 'you have to choose between A and
B',
> and
> thus every A and B is relevant, unless it's either someone's
> pet/hobby
> project or a project which is dead for a long time.
>
> FB
>
>
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> <mailto:nhusers%[email protected]> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
