I send you a link with my posts about ConfORM.
here again : http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/search/label/ConfORM

One of those has the origin, the discussion in dev-list, opinions from FNH
guys, opinions of others people... everything is public... if you want know
anything you have to read and you have to follow various links.
I'm a little bit tired...
If you don't have time, I'm sorry, I don't like to repeat myself so often.

If the XML seems to you very confusing and odd, then don't use it... you
have many others option to map your domain to a RDBMS.

Again:
This is NH's world
Welcome to world of options.
Welcome to NHibernate 3!!!

Be happy.

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote:

> > ConfORM is the result of a vision.
> > You can read the introduction and the original motivation here:
> >
> http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/02/conform-nhibernate-un-mapping.html
> >
> > ConfORM is the result of "landing a dream": ORuM ORuM = Object Relational
> > unMapping
>
>         couple of questions, as I'm confused now:
> - the blogpost refers to a dev discussion which starts with a question
> about
> what to with this with respect to NH3. Does this mean that the NH team
> pushes confORM for NH3? I ask this because if that's the case we need to
> add
> support for it in llblgen pro when NH3 ships
> - it seems confORM stays somewhat close to the XML. I find that odd,
> considering that the xml design for nhibernate (coming from hibernate) is
> sometimes inconsistent and very confusing.
>
> > would be very nice to have a domain-model and let a bot chose its
> > representation a to a RDBMS or a NoSQL system.
>
>         what do you see as the 'domain model' then? A bucket of C# code? I
> hope not.
>
>                FB
>
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Frans Bouma <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >       >              That still tells me that it tries to solve the same
> > problem
> >       > Fluent
> >       >       NH tries to solve too: a typed way to map classes to tables
> > for the
> >       >       NHibernate framework.
> >       >
> >       >
> >       > Perhaps...
> >       > as MsTest, xUnit, MbUnit tries to solve the same problem of NUnit
> > as C#,
> >       > Vb.Net, Delphi... tries to sole the same problem of Java as
> > Ninject, Funq,
> >       > Castle, StructureMap, Autofact tries to solve the same problem of
> > Spring
> >       as
> >       > EntityFrame4, LLBLGen, and others tries to solve the same problem
> > of
> >       > Hibernate as MacOS, Windows, Unix, Umbutu, Suse and others tries
> to
> > solve
> >       > the same problem.
> >       > and this is only a very partial and minimal representation of the
> >       situation
> >       > we are living
> >
> >
> >              Ok, let me try it one more time, differently this time: is
> > ConfORM
> >       an option used by a lot of people using nhibernate or is this the
> > plan of
> >       the NH team, over FluentNH/XML?
> >
> >              It's about what the NH framework is 'recommending' as the
> >       'preferred' approach. I don't care what your personal preferences
> are
> > in
> >       this, I just want to know what's the preferred way and what it will
> > be in
> >       the future (e.g. NH3). If they solve different problems, then it's
> > not a way
> >       of 'you have to choose between A and B'. As they look like they
> solve
> > the
> >       same problem, it is a matter of 'you have to choose between A and
> B',
> > and
> >       thus every A and B is relevant, unless it's either someone's
> > pet/hobby
> >       project or a project which is dead for a long time.
> >
> >                      FB
> >
> >
> >
> >       --
> >
> >       You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "nhusers" group.
> >       To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >       To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> > <mailto:nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>>
> .
> >       For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "nhusers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to