I don't know why you take this personally (I don't).
This is a technical forum, where we (should) present technical arguments to
improve our designs and usage of tools.
When I read something that I don't agree with (based on my knowledge and
experience), I usually jump in to correct it. That's how a forum works.
Diego
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 15:30, Vadim Chekan <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are right,
>
> I noticed that NH maillist has a culture of quick blaming people of
> "bad design", "do you know what unit tests is", "who made you doing
> wrong design", etc.
>
> Too bad. This creates very acid environment. Whenever I express my
> thoughts and provide my arguments in details, somebody just jumps out
> with 1-line accusation and it takes another mail roundrip just to get
> an explanation what the opponent meant.
>
> Is it just me being sick of this "culture" of treating opponents as
> heretics to be burnt?
>
> Vadim.
>
> On Aug 13, 7:52 pm, Jeffry Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Wow, there's a lot of love going on in this thread ;)
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Diego Mijelshon <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 14:56, Vadim Chekan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >> On Aug 12, 7:28 pm, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> > Seriously?
> >
> > >> > Do you know what a unit test is?
> >
> > >> Of course, it is a silver bullet which magically eliminates bugs. No?
> > >> I'm sure you know that no unit test gives any guarantee. It gives you
> > >> feeling that the app is in descent shape after changes, but nothing
> > >> more.
> >
> > > No. Unit tests are what you use to avoid introducing new bugs AND
> asserting
> > > correctness (among other things)
> > > In my BIG application, I automatically generate a small persistence
> test
> > > for each entity (a modified ghostbuster).
> > > If, for example, a field name is wrong, I'll get a failing test.
> >
> > > There's absolutely NO difference between what XML and FNH can do about
> > > this. See my last point in this email too.
> >
> > >> > Have you ever used a real refactoring tool (like R#)?
> >
> > >> I state that xml editing is not easy. And your argument that it
> > >> requires (or is recommended) to use R# just proves my point.
> >
> > > If you are a professional developer, you'll use the best available
> tools.
> > > Of course you can install the .NET SDK and work in Notepad if you want,
> but
> > > then don't complain about C# editing being hard.
> >
> > >> > Do you understand what Configuration.BuildSessionFactory does?
> >
> > >> Builds session factory? :) What is your question really?
> >
> > > It compiles the configuration. Just like csc.exe compiles C#.
> > > You said "Static check is safer then dynamic error". And that's not the
> > > point, because the first test I write for a NH solution is the
> > > "ConfigurationIsValid", which is essentially a build-time check.
> >
> > > Diego
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
