> I don't know why you take this personally (I don't).
> 
> This is a technical forum, where we (should) present technical arguments
to
> improve our designs and usage of tools.
> When I read something that I don't agree with (based on my knowledge and
> experience), I usually jump in to correct it. That's how a forum works.

        something to think about: when MS shipped linq to sql, they had over
a million (!) unit tests for it. Still there were bugs in it. I.o.w.: if you
think that a couple of thousand tests will save your *** because if you make
a mistake they'll notify you, you're naïve ;)

                FB

> 
>     Diego
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 15:30, Vadim Chekan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>       You are right,
> 
>       I noticed that NH maillist has a culture of quick blaming people of
>       "bad design", "do you know what unit tests is", "who made you doing
>       wrong design", etc.
> 
>       Too bad. This creates very acid environment. Whenever I express my
>       thoughts and provide my arguments in details, somebody just jumps
out
>       with 1-line accusation and it takes another mail roundrip just to
get
>       an explanation what the opponent meant.
> 
>       Is it just me being sick of this "culture" of treating opponents as
>       heretics to be burnt?
> 
>       Vadim.
> 
> 
>       On Aug 13, 7:52 pm, Jeffry Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
>       > Wow, there's a lot of love going on in this thread ;)
>       >
> 
>       > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Diego Mijelshon
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>       >
>       > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 14:56, Vadim Chekan
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>       >
>       > >> On Aug 12, 7:28 pm, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>       > >> > Seriously?
>       >
>       > >> > Do you know what a unit test is?
>       >
>       > >> Of course, it is a silver bullet which magically eliminates
> bugs. No?
>       > >> I'm sure you know that no unit test gives any guarantee. It
> gives you
>       > >> feeling that the app is in descent shape after changes, but
> nothing
>       > >> more.
>       >
>       > > No. Unit tests are what you use to avoid introducing new bugs
AND
> asserting
>       > > correctness (among other things)
>       > > In my BIG application, I automatically generate a small
> persistence test
>       > > for each entity (a modified ghostbuster).
>       > > If, for example, a field name is wrong, I'll get a failing test.
>       >
>       > > There's absolutely NO difference between what XML and FNH can do
> about
>       > > this. See my last point in this email too.
>       >
>       > >> > Have you ever used a real refactoring tool (like R#)?
>       >
>       > >> I state that xml editing is not easy. And your argument that it
>       > >> requires (or is recommended) to use R# just proves my point.
>       >
>       > > If you are a professional developer, you'll use the best
> available tools.
>       > > Of course you can install the .NET SDK and work in Notepad if
you
> want, but
>       > > then don't complain about C# editing being hard.
>       >
>       > >> > Do you understand what Configuration.BuildSessionFactory
does?
>       >
>       > >> Builds session factory? :) What is your question really?
>       >
>       > > It compiles the configuration. Just like csc.exe compiles C#.
>       > > You said "Static check is safer then dynamic error". And that's
> not the
>       > > point, because the first test I write for a NH solution is the
>       > > "ConfigurationIsValid", which is essentially a build-time check.
>       >
>       > >   Diego
>       >
>       > > --
>       > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google Groups
>       > > "nhusers" group.
>       > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>       > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> 
>       > > [email protected]
> <mailto:nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]
> <mailto:nhusers%[email protected]> >
> 
>       > > .
>       > > For more options, visit this group at
>       > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> 
>       --
>       You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nhusers" group.
>       To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>       To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> <mailto:nhusers%[email protected]> .
>       For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to