Diego On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]> wrote: > If anyone can tell me how using FNH will provide more validation than that, > I'll start using it now :-) > Moreover, why do some people think that this: > Property(x => x.TheData).Column("the_data"); > is "safer" or "more static" (?) than: > <property name="TheData" column="the_data"/> > ...considering the former just produces the latter?
If i don't have to change column names, and I almost never do, the benefit for me is I can write just Property( x=>x.TheData) and know 100% that this is going to work due to the compile time checks. I don't need a test to validate, although i'm sure i'll them. This is a lot more refactoring friendly with just VS. -- thanks cliff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
