Did you read the part of my email that you left out?
The test is already there. It's 1 line long. I don't have to do _anything_
To rename, I press Ctrl-R+R, and it will find both code and XML references.
Diego
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 19:39, cliff vaughn <[email protected]>wrote:
> Diego
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Diego Mijelshon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > If anyone can tell me how using FNH will provide more validation than
> that,
> > I'll start using it now :-)
> > Moreover, why do some people think that this:
> > Property(x => x.TheData).Column("the_data");
> > is "safer" or "more static" (?) than:
> > <property name="TheData" column="the_data"/>
> > ...considering the former just produces the latter?
>
> If i don't have to change column names, and I almost never do, the
> benefit for me is I can write just
>
> Property( x=>x.TheData)
>
> and know 100% that this is going to work due to the compile time
> checks. I don't need a test to validate, although i'm sure i'll them.
> This is a lot more refactoring friendly with just VS.
>
> --
> thanks
>
> cliff
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
