Not "each entity" but "each persister"... or "each root-entity"

On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Thomas Koch <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, using NHProf (why didn't I think of that before?)
>
> So to answer my own question "no there is no reace condition"
>
>
> Details:
>
> 1)
> begin transaction with isolation level: Unspecified
>
> 2)
> Reading high value:
> select next_hi
> from   hibernate_unique_key with (updlock ,rowlock)
>
> 3)
> Updating high value:
> update hibernate_unique_key
> set    next_hi = 1590 /* @p0 */
> where  next_hi = 1589 /* @p1 */
>
> 4)
> Reading high value:
> select next_hi
> from   hibernate_unique_key with (updlock ,rowlock)
>
> 5)
> Updating high value:
> update hibernate_unique_key
> set    next_hi = 1591 /* @p0 */
> where  next_hi = 1590 /* @p1 */
>
> 6)
> Inserting my order
>
> 7)
> Insert an address
>
> 8)
> commit transaction
>
>
>
> The reason I am seeing two updates of the key table is that each
> entity gets its own high value.
>
> Thomas
>
> On 10 Sep., 14:05, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > since the source of "high" is concentrated in one place.... ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Thomas Koch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi - I use the hi-lo generator for my domain and have a question
> > > regarding its use in multiple processes.
> >
> > > I have a WCF project that is the primary power behind generating
> > > entities and saving them to the database with NHibernate and HI-LO. I
> > > also have an administrative application that sometimes generate
> > > entities for the domain.
> >
> > > Since these two applications live en separate processes, is there a
> > > risk here of them creating overlapping id's ?
> >
> > > As far as I have understood, each session factory will update the
> > > "hibernate_unique_key" table and generate ids based on the "high"
> > > value returned.
> >
> > > Can the reading and updating of this "next high value" be considered
> > > an atomtic operation even though its done in separate processes?
> >
> > > Regards
> > > Thomas
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> ­>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Maulo- Skjul tekst i anførselstegn -
> >
> > - Vis tekst i anførselstegn -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Fabio Maulo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to