> Interesting case. > I can't discover a clear pattern for the "double-parent" in Match but > perhaps I can add a short-cut to avoid the explicit declaration of the > column-name. > Nice.
So you would keep both ManyToOne relationships between Match and Roster? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
