> Currently the workaround I use has always been mapping to a one-to-many > private list field, and have your setter/getter to access the first item in > that list.
Hi Hendry, Many thanks for the reply. Thats the workaround I've gone with. This is a shame but not the end of the world. Jordan. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
