Ciao Fabio

ww have a lot problem about this.. you mean just change like this in
config file?
<property
name="transaction.factory_class">NHibernate.Transaction.AdoNetWithDistributedTransactionFactory</
property>

thanks


On Dec 14, 12:30 pm, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
> You don't have to go back to NH2.0.x
> The NHibernate.Transaction.AdoNetWithDistributedTransactionFactory is there
> even in NH3.0.0
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Mauro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Lakshman
>
> > after a week spent to find we got so many
> > “Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a
> > connection from the pool.  This may have occurred because all pooled
> > connections were in use and max pool size was reached”
>
> > we reach the conclusion that what you report should be the problem.
> > ..made some tests and we have same problem with around 25 tps .. but
> > we cannot change the database from 2005 to 2008 right now and we
> > cannot go back with the 2.0.1 version.
>
> > Can you suggest a quick fix ?
> > please let me know..
> > thanks
>
> > On Nov 4, 1:37 pm, Lakshman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > We found the problem and applied a solution for this issue.
>
> > > This problem happens only with SQL Server 2005 as the backend and it
> > > goes away with SQL Server 2008 R2. The root cause is the new class for
> > > transaction management (the default under NH
> > > 2.1.x)NHibernate.Transaction.AdoNetWithDistributedTransactionFactory.
>
> > > In NH 2.0.1 the transaction management class was
> > > NHibernate.Transaction.AdoNetTransactionFactory which hasn't caused
> > > any problem.
>
> > > Luckily, we were able to configure this as part of the NH
> > > configuration. We configured the transaction.factory_class property
> > > and had set it to NHibernate.Transaction.AdoNetTransactionFactory to
> > > resolve the issue.
>
> > > On Oct 6, 12:44 pm, Jason Meckley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > how is spring handling session management. the problem isn't 2.1.2.
> > > > the problem is how you are managing 2.1.2.
>
> > > > On Oct 6, 9:21 am, Lakshman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Thanks Jose. We delegate the session / transaction management to
> > > > > Spring.NET.
>
> > > > > On Oct 5, 2:58 pm, José F. Romaniello <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > It seems that somehow your application is not properly disposing
> > the
> > > > > > connections...
> > > > > > How do you handle sessions?
>
> > > > > > 2010/10/5 Lakshman <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > All,
>
> > > > > > > We have been using NHibernate 2.0.0 and Spring.NET 1.2 in our WCF
> > web
> > > > > > > services.
>
> > > > > > > We recently tried to migrate to NHibernate 2.1.2 and Spring.NET
> > 1.3.0
> > > > > > > and since then started getting the following error at 20 TPS with
> > 100
> > > > > > > users using Load Runner testing.
>
> > > > > > > “Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining
> > a
> > > > > > > connection from the pool.  This may have occurred because all
> > pooled
> > > > > > > connections were in use and max pool size was reached”
>
> > > > > > > We mitigated that error by setting the Max Pool Size to 1000.
> > But, the
> > > > > > > web service server eventually crashed at 80 TPS with 400 users (
> > again
> > > > > > > Load Runner).
>
> > > > > > > We thought we would move back to NHibernate 2.0.1. We didn't get
> > any
> > > > > > > errors or server crash with Spring.NET 1.3.0 and NHibernate 2.0.1
> > at
> > > > > > > 80 TPS with 400 users ( again Load Runner).
>
> > > > > > > I am not sure what is going on with NH 2.1.2. Was it performance
> > > > > > > tested at high loads? Did anyone else had similar issues? Is the
> > fix
> > > > > > > available in NH 3.0?
>
> > > > > > > Appreciate your inputs.
>
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Lakshman
>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google Groups
> > > > > > > "nhusers" group.
> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]­>
> > <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%252bunsubscr...@googlegroup­s.com>
> > ­­­>
> > > > > > > .
> > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.-Hidequotedtext-
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "nhusers" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]­>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to