That will be a team decision. If you are using ConfORM you know that you can mix mappings from ConfORM with XML mapping and obviously with sexy-mappings (but you know which is the more sexy). I'm planning to remove some stuff from ConfORM, basically all those classes/interfaces are now directly available in NHibernate. The mapping-engine of NHibernate (ModelMapper) is a reduced version of ConfORM mapping-engine (Mapper). Well... the discussion may become large... To be short, don't worry and continue using what fit your needs.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Paulo Quicoli <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi friends, > this question is targeted for Fabio... > > Fabio, you are the mind behind ConfOrm... now I'm seeing NH 3.2 new > fetures... such as mapping by code. > I've embranced ConfOrm in my project since you introduced then, now, > thinking in future, it will be always an option for mapping in NHibernate, > or are your thinking about NH 3.2, 3.3. 3.X introduce a replacement for > ConfOrm? > > Thanks for you hard work, and thanks for all NHibernate commiters > > -- > Paulo Quicoli > Editor Técnico: .NET Magazine, ClubeDelphi Magazine; Editor: WebMobile > Magazine > www.devmedia.com.br > www.nhibernatebrasil.net > http://pauloquicoli.spaces.live.com > twitter:@pauloquicoli > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > -- Fabio Maulo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
