This is bug NH-2583, on which we are currently working. The newest NH from the repository has been fixed by checkins by Patrick, but there are still similar problems (e.g. with the ?? operator). Regards Harald
On 27 Apr., 19:03, smalldave <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have > > class ProductGroup > { > public string Code{ get; set;} > } > > class Product > { > public string Code { get; set; } > > public ProductGroup Group { get; set; } > } > > I map Product using (not all products belong to product group) > > class ProductMapping : ClassMap<Product> > { > void ProductMapping() > { > References(x => x.Group).Nullable.NotFound.Ignore; > } > } > > Now I'm give a code that could be for either the product or the > product group. The product and product group codes are mutually > exclusive so I query as follows, > > session.Query<Product>().Where(x => x.Code = "123" || x.Group.Code = > "123"); > > This results in an inner join (or the non-ansi 92 equivalient). As > such a product that doesn't belong to a product group but has code > "123" will not be returned in the query. > > Given that I've made it clear that ProductGroup is nullable shouldn't > this join be a left outer? Is there some reason it isn't? Is there a > work around? > > Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
