Uhm... Don't map it.
On 2011-05-25 23:28, Roman Hnatiuk wrote:
I am n00b at NHibernate too, but could
http://www.adamaldrich.com/blog/post/NHibernate-Read-Only-Property-Mapping.aspx
be the answer? I mean specifying access="readonly" in the property
mapping. Unfortunately, I cannot try it now as I am not at my
computer.
On May 25, 6:57 pm, Dave McGlade<[email protected]> wrote:
As a new NHibernate user, I've been carrying out some tests that have
led me to want a property that should not be persisted. Simply not
naming the column in the HBM.XML files isn't enough because NHibernate
finds the Property by reflection. Using insert=false/update=false
isn't enough because that still wants to read the value from the
database. Declaring the property as virtual does work, but I don't
like it because virtual has semantic implications and so I can't
guarantee we could always use that approach.
So what is the best way of marking a property as 'to be ignored for
persistance?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
