Ah - missed this reply. Right. That explains what I am seeing. hmm - Fair enough. (I thought it would only go to the database if the primary key was an identity column.)
To be honest I haven't actually found the time to right any tests that confirm the exact behaviour. I ended up just changing the code that depended on it. regards, Jordan. On Jul 19, 5:26 pm, John Davidson <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that merge has an implied flush that happens if it is required, i.e. > if there is an insert condition - it is necessary to assigned the object id > and validate that it stored correctly > > John Davidson > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
