Gunnar,
I sent you a link to a ZIP file with a sample that demonstrates the
issue. If we find a resolution, I'll post the problem and the
correction to the list.
Thank you again!
Don
On Aug 31, 11:31 am, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]> wrote:
> How about..
>
> Session.Query<ResultObject>().Select(ro => new
> {Id=ro.Id,Rank=ro.DoSearch("foo", "bar")}).OrderBy(p =>p.Rank)
>
> ?
>
> /G
> 2011/8/31 mysterd429 <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > When executing Session.Query<ResultObject>().OrderBy(ro =>
> > ro.DoSearch("foo", "bar").Select(ro => ro.DoSearch("foo", "bar").
>
> > On Aug 31, 10:34 am, mysterd429 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Gunnar,
>
> > > Both of these examples mimic the SQL in .NET, which does not make
> > > sense for this application. There is no way to mimic the results of
> > > FREETEXT (which my UDF wraps), so I'm a little confused: what is the
> > > purpose of mimicking the SQL in .NET? My understanding based on the
> > > articles that you provided was that the HQL generator would always be
> > > used and that the method was just a placeholder. There is no
> > > mechanism to mimic my UDF.
>
> > > I implemented the BuildHql method (remarkably simple), and it's used
> > > for OrderBy, but not for Select. If there is no way to force
> > > NHibernate to translate to HQL by both? Here's the SQL that I get
> > > (formatted and with the names of our actual domain objects removed):
>
> > > select
> > > resultobject0_.RESULT_OBJECT_ID
> > > , /* other properties */
> > > from
> > > RESULT_OBJECT resultobject0_
> > > order by
> > > (
> > > SELECT
> > > RANK
> > > FROM
> > > DO_SEARCH(@p0, @p1)
> > > WHERE
> > > RESULT_OBJECT_ID = resultobject0_.RESULT_OBJECT_ID
> > > ) asc
>
> > > I was expecting something more like this:
>
> > > select
> > > DO_SEARCH(@p0, @p1)
> > > from
> > > RESULT_OBJECT resultobject0_
> > > order by
> > > (
> > > SELECT
> > > RANK
> > > FROM
> > > DO_SEARCH(@p0, @p1)
> > > WHERE
> > > RESULT_OBJECT_ID = resultobject0_.RESULT_OBJECT_ID
> > > ) asc
>
> > > Thanks for your help. I appreciate it.
>
> > > On Aug 31, 10:04 am, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > That is what this article is all about.
>
> > > >http://www.primordialcode.com/blog/post/nhibernate-customize-linq-pro.
> > ..
>
> > > > or this
>
> > > >http://fabiomaulo.blogspot.com/2010/07/nhibernate-linq-provider-exten.
> > ..
>
> > > > /G
>
> > > > 2011/8/31 mysterd429 <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > Gunnar,
>
> > > > > Thanks for your help so far. I originally had a UDF, so I've
> > > > > converted back to the UDF. I've got an extension method for
> > > > > ResultObject called GetSearchRank, which takes the same parameters as
> > > > > the UDF in addition the "this" parameter and returns -1 (temporarily
> > > > > for testing). I've created a dialect that is a subclass of
> > > > > MsSql2008Dialect, an HQL generator that is a subclass of
> > > > > BaseHqlGeneratorForMethod, and an HQL generators registry that is a
> > > > > subclass of another HQL generators registry common to all of our
> > > > > projects (all it does it add the "trim" function for strings.)
>
> > > > > When I try to run the code, the generator registry is getting built,
> > > > > and execution goes to the BuildHql gets called (I've not yet
> > > > > implemented it) when I do Session.Query<ResultObject>().OrderBy(ro =>
> > > > > ro.GetSearchRank("foo", "bar")), but when I do
> > > > > Session.Query<ResultObject>().Select(ro => ro.GetSearchRank("foo",
> > > > > "bar")), I just get a queryable full of -1.
>
> > > > > How can I get NHibernate to translate the method call to SQL instead
> > > > > of executing it on the .NET side?
>
> > > > > Thanks!
>
> > > > > Don
>
> > > > > On Aug 30, 7:54 pm, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Since you're inlining this in a SELECT, you should not use your SP.
> > > > > Either
> > > > > > use FREETEXTTABLE directly or create a UDF.
>
> > > > > > The steps are:
>
> > > > > > 1. Customize the SQL dialect and configure NHibernate to use it
> > > > > > 2. Register the functions in the Linq provider
> > > > > > 3. Something like what you described.
>
> > > > > > /G
>
> > > > > > 2011/8/30 mysterd429 <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > Hi, Gunnar,
>
> > > > > > > Okay, that will work, I think. I would use my existing stored
> > > > > > > procedure rather than FREETEXTTABLE. Would these be the steps:
>
> > > > > > > 1. Customize the LINQ provider using something like
> > > > > > > RegisterFunction("GetRank", /* SQLFunctionTemplate or
> > > > > > > StandardSQLFunction, not sure, that calls DO_SEARCH using T-SQL
> > */).
> > > > > > > 2. Do something like this:
>
> > > > > > > String field1, field2, field3;
> > > > > > > // assign field1, field2, field3
> > > > > > > IQueryable<SearchResult> queryable =
> > > > > > > Session.Query<ResultObject>().Select(ro => new SearchResult
> > > > > > > { ResultObject = ro, Rank = GetRank(ro, field1, field2,
> > > > > > > field3) }).Where(ro => GetRank(ro, field1, field, field3) ?? 0 >
> > 0);
> > > > > > > if(myUtilityInstance != null) queryable =
> > > > > > > myUtilityInstance.Paginate(queryable);
> > > > > > > results = queryable.ToList();
>
> > > > > > > Does that seem about right? Thanks so much for your help!
>
> > > > > > > Regards,
>
> > > > > > > Don
>
> > > > > > > On Aug 30, 3:40 pm, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > > > While there may be ways to get the result set of a stored
> > procedure
> > > > > into
> > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > NhQueryable, it doesn't make much sense, since any extra Linq
> > > > > predicates
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > apply will then by run on the full result set (when paging
> > etc.), and
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > do that, you might just as well apply it after the query, with
> > in
> > > > > memory
> > > > > > > > operations.
>
> > > > > > > > I still think that a custom SQL function is feasible. You will
> > have
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > reshape it into a scalar value...
>
> > > > > > > > SELECT ...., (SELECT [RANK] FROM
> > > > > FREETEXTTABLE(tableref,columnref,value)
> > > > > > > > WHERE [KEY]=tableref.Id) as [RANK] FROM ...
>
> > > > > > > > Maybe not easy, but doable.
>
> > > > > > > > /G
>
> > > > > > > > 2011/8/30 mysterd429 <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reply, Gunnar. Unfortunately, I don't see how
> > I can
> > > > > > > > > use these links. I'm trying to use FREETEXTTABLE, which
> > provides a
> > > > > > > > > result set with the search results, not FREETEXT, which is
> > scalar.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > need to know not only that a row matches, but what its
> > relative
> > > > > rank
> > > > > > > > > is in the result set. From the MSDN documentation,
> > FREETEXTTABLE
> > > > > > > > > "[r]eturns a table of zero, one, or more rows for those
> > columns
> > > > > > > > > containing character-based data types for values that
> > match....
> > > > > > > > > FREETEXTTABLE can only be referenced in the FROM clause of a
> > SELECT
> > > > > > > > > statement like a regular table name." The stored procedure I
> > have
> > > > > > > > > essentially wraps FREETEXTTABLE.
>
> > > > > > > > > Is there any way to get the result set of a stored procedure
> > into
> > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > NhQueryable?
>
> > > > > > > > > Thanks!
>
> > > > > > > > > On Aug 30, 11:55 am, Gunnar Liljas <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> >http://www.primordialcode.com/blog/post/nhibernate-customize-linq-pro.
> > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > > > > and
>
> >http://darioquintana.com.ar/blogging/2009/03/13/registering-freetext-.
> > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > > > > 2011/8/30 mysterd429 <[email protected]>
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I've got an existing database that uses FREETEXTTABLE in
> > a
> > > > > stored
> > > > > > > > > > > procedure. I've been using the NHibernate LINQ provider
> > (since
> > > > > > > we're
> > > > > > > > > > > switching from LINQ to SQL to NHibernate), and I'd like
> > to know
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > > > > > there's a way to use FREETEXTTABLE using the LINQ
> > provider.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > stored procedure takes a few parameters and selects the
> > desired
> > > > > > > result
> > > > > > > > > > > set (KEY and RANK columns). I have a class for these
> > search
> > > > > result
> > > > > > > > > > > rows.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Currently, I can use the stored procedure using a named
> > SQL
> > > > > query
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > get back attached entities:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > IQuery query = Session.GetNamedQuery("DoSearch");
> > > > > > > > > > > query.SetParameter("searchTerm", searchTerm);
> > > > > > > > > > > IList<SearchResult> results = query.List<SearchResult>();
> > > > > > > > > > > // results[0].ResultObject is the first underlying
> > object.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > We have a few utility methods that use LINQ for some
> > processing
> > > > > > > > > > > (sorting, pagination, etc) that I'd like to reuse with
> > this
> > > > > stored
> > > > > > > > > > > procedure.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Ideally, I'd like to do something like:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > var doSearch =
> > > > > > > Session.GetQueryableObjectFromNamedQuery("DoSearch");
> > > > > > > > > > > doSearch.SetParameter("serachTerm", searchTerm);
> > > > > > > > > > > IQueryable<SearchResult> resultsQueryable =
> > > > > doSearch.AsQueryable();
> > > > > > > > > > > IList<SearchResult> results =
> > > > > > > > > > > myUtilityInstance.SortAndPaginate(resultsQueryable);
>
> > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas? Thanks!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to
> > the
> > > > > Google
> > > > > > > > > Groups
> > > > > > > > > > > "nhusers" group.
> > > > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > > > > > [email protected].
> > > > > > > > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
