Fabio, As time goes on, do you intend to port more of ConfORM to NHibernate? I've been trying out the convention support built in to NHibernate 3.2 and it's working great. In fact, so far, the ONLY convention I haven't been able to do is many-to-many...all without ConfORM. So do you foresee adding additional support to NHibernate so that this will be supported "out of the box" in the future, without ConfORM?
Thanks! Billy McCafferty On Aug 29, 8:06 am, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL!!! > To transform NH's 3.2.0 sexy-mapping to ConfORM you have to take each > PatternApplier and transform it to the delegate (event handler) used in > NH... Then you have to implements the IModelInspector taking the code from > herehttp://code.google.com/p/codeconform/source/browse/ConfOrm/ConfOrm/Ob... > > Note: > The ConventionModelMapper is just a "custom" implementation of ModelMapper > and both uses an embedded implementation of IModelInspector. > > The ConfORM's chunk ported in NH is a represents a "simplification"of > ConfORM mostly because I'm pretty sure that 80% of users will use the > Conformist-mapping. > > If you really want use convention/patterns based mapping then stay in > ConfORM. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
