Alright, this sounds the right way to go, thanks a lot.

Do you think this is something that should be supported by NH for version
properties of datetime or timestamp type?

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 15:27, TheCPUWizard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Marios,****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes there are other considerations for a robust system. But just think
> about the implication of a user changing the time on the computer. Either
> the original time was wrong or the new time is wrong. But either can be
> compensated for by using something (e.g. Stopwatch) which increments time
> independently of the system clock once the time has been dealt with once.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> David****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Marios Skounakis
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2011 1:18 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [nhusers] Timestamping records in desktop application****
>
> ** **
>
> This sounds very interesting. It certainly is efficient.
>
> One problem is how can you guard against the user changing the machine's
> clock time - I think you can subscribe to some TimeChangedEvent and query
> the database again...
>
> ****
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 01:10, TheCPUWizard <[email protected]> wrote:
> ****
>
> Alternatively, just query the database once, set an offset, and be golden…
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *[email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 01, 2011 2:20 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [nhusers] Timestamping records in desktop application****
>
>  ****
>
> why not just put them in a trigger in the db?
>
> On , Marios Skounakis <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Consider a desktop application in which you want to timestamp records
> (store the current date in fields "DateCreated" and "DateUpdated"). Since
> it's running on the clients you can't reliably use DateTime.Now as each
> client may have a different time, instead you somehow need to get the
> database time.
> >
> >
> > Things I have considered:
> > 1. Getting the time from the database every time you need it (e.g.
> before inserting or updating each record). This can be slow.
> > 2. Use an interceptor to get the time from the database at session flush
> and update the respective fields for all entities.
> >
> > 3. Use generated properties. This sounds bad too as it requires an extra
> select for each insert/update.
> >
> > (2) seems to be the best solution. Do people agree? Is there a better
> approach for this?
> >
> > On a related note, if you have a datetime or timestamp version property,
> how does NH set its value? In principle, if you have a record that was just
> inserted and never updated, DateCreated, DateUpdated and the version
> property should all have the same value.
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Marios
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "nhusers" group.
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> >
> >
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> >
> >
> > ****
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.****
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.****
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

Reply via email to