On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Maximilian Raditya <[email protected]>wrote:
> I couldn't agree more then. Well, I personally don't use it, as I use > Castle NHibernate Integration for resolving it. It's just since the OP has > already used it, I choose to continue it from what he's done. > True, that is why the OP should decide whether the banhandler is part of the overal uow or it is not. If it is the first, the he should remove the transaction management in the ban handler to rely on the overal transaction or keep it seperate and let it create its own nhibernate session. Ramon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
