Thanks for the response. I apologize for not being clear in my communication. By run time I mean: We are planning on allowing the customer to decide what attributes of an entity that they would like to track for auditing. It is acceptable to require that the session factory be re-created after this decision is made or after a change is made to decide what attributes are tracked. As far as the "certain properties": No they are not common across all of the audited entities. Assume a simple entity with the attributes of Id, Description, Type, and Hours. We would like the ability to generate an audit record when either the Description or Type changes and have the Hours included in the audit record; however, we do not want an audit record generated if only the Hours change. Is this possible?
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:10:46 PM UTC-5, Roger wrote: > 1. What do you mean by "run time configuration"? You don't mean changing > what properties to audit after the session factory has been created, right? > But yes, you are right. Fluent interface currently only support "exclusion > model". > > 2. An entity and its audited counterpart share the same .net type. > What are these "certain attributes"? Are they common for all audited > entities (eg like who did the change), if so - make your own revision > entity. > > ________________________________ > Från: [email protected] <javascript:> > [[email protected]<javascript:>] > för David Keck [[email protected] <javascript:>] > Skickat: den 18 december 2012 16:56 > Till: [email protected] <javascript:> > Ämne: [nhusers] NHibernate Envers fluent interface and property tracking > questions > > We are looking at using Envers to audit several of our entities and I have > been looking at the documentation and have two questions that I am hoping > someone can answer: > > 1. It looks like the fluent interface for configuring entity auditing is > an exclusion model where all of the mapped properties of the entity are > audited by default unless a property is explicitly excluded. We plan to do > run time configuration of the audited properties based on information > provided by the user and would prefer to have an inclusion model were we > specify in fluent the fields to include. So far it looks like this is not > supported in the fluent interface. Am I correct? > > > 2. We have a requirement to always include certain attributes in the audit > that are part of the entity being tracked, but we do not want changes to > these specific attributes to trigger an audit record. In a sense they just > come along for the ride and would load into the entity when we query with > the AuditReader. I see that the RevisionEntity can store additional > information, but that does not seem to be the correct solution for us since > I don't believe that the RevisionEntity information will load back into the > entities property during the query. Is there a straight-forward way to > support this requirement with Envers? > > > Thanks for any guidance that you can provide. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/OVi89ImRB4MJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/nhusers/-/Myp5CR8MTC0J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
