On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 2:42:14 PM UTC-4, Gunnar Liljas wrote: > > It is transparent and can be a viable performance booster, if you are > willing to pay the price (as in actual $$$, since it requires MSSQL > Enterprise) > > Great. Thanks. My company already has Enterprise edition, so it looks like a good option for us.
Cheers, Aaron > > > 2015-09-15 15:41 GMT+02:00 Aaron Boxer <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > >> To improve performance, my company is considering partitioning large >> tables by date range. >> Does NH need to know about this partition, or is it transparent to NH? >> >> My feeling is that it should be transparent, because partitioning should >> simply affect how the DB stores >> data on disk. >> >> Thanks!!! >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "nhusers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
