You are certainly free to compile your own version, of course. 2015-10-07 6:11 GMT+02:00 Anil Khanna <[email protected]>:
> Would an alternative be where we change the grammar definition to support > (+) constructs... > > br > > Anil > > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 3:26:52 PM UTC+5:30, Anil Khanna wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> We are looking at the opportunity to migrate from NH 1.2 to NH 4.0.4. Yes >> there was a long gap, but we know business ways are different from the >> technical ones. >> >> One of the breaking changes that we see is that Outer Joins structure of >> (+) is not supported any more. >> >> Earlier the following construct worked very well. - SELECT A.ID, B.NAME >> FROM T1 A, T2 B WHERE A.ID (+)= B.ID AND A.CODE(+)=:code >> >> However now the parser throws an unrecognized pattern error. (ANTLR has >> been introduced which was not present in NH 1.2) >> >> I have read some documentation and all of them say that we have to use >> the key words "outer join" (left / right) to get this working - in a >> particular way. >> >> We have more than 3000 such <(+)> constructs and was wondering if there >> is a way to get this working without refactoring the existing code. >> >> Thanks for your help in advance. >> >> Regards, >> >> Anil >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhusers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhusers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
