Ah dang...  thanks for the correction.

On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 at 4:40:48 AM UTC-7, Gunnar Liljas wrote:
>
> The level 1 cache is tied to the session, the level 2 cache is tied to the 
> session factory.
>
> 2016-05-25 3:28 GMT+02:00 Tyler Austen <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>>:
>
>> If I remember correctly, NHibernate's 1st-level cache is tied to the 
>> session factory (eg. lives beyond disposal of individual sessions)...  and 
>> is shared across all session instances allocated from the factory. This 
>> means that as your application runs, data will accumulate in this cache. It 
>> will look like a leak, and depending on your perspective, could be 
>> considered one except that the 1st level cache is intentional.
>>
>> I'm not sure what the answer to the "Why now?" question would be, but 
>> perhaps recent versions of NHibernate more aggressively lean on the 
>> 1st-level cache?
>>
>> Hopefully this helps,
>>
>> Tyler
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 8:14:19 AM UTC-7, Vincent Decrauzat wrote:
>>>
>>> We are using NHibernate in different products since years and without 
>>> any problem.
>>> Recently, we are facing a memory leak issue in some new sites.
>>> Investigating with a profiler, we have found that the problem is 
>>> NHibernate sessions that are not garbage collected.
>>> This is really strange as all our interactions with NHibernate are 
>>> following this pattern:
>>>
>>> using(ISession session = nhibernateHelper.OpenSession())
>>> {
>>> // Read or write data...
>>> }
>>>
>>> The helper is just a singleton that has a private session factory 
>>> initialized at startup.
>>>
>>> It must be somehow related to the environment, because exactly the same 
>>> binaries with exactly the same database are leaking on a machine but not on 
>>> another one.
>>>
>>> We have tried with different versions of .NET (4.5.2 and 4.6.1), no 
>>> change
>>> We have tried with software in debug or release. It leaks faster on 
>>> debug, but it leaks in both configurations.
>>>
>>> Our database is postgres 9.4 
>>> We are running on a Windows 2012 R2 server.
>>> The software is running as a Windows service, it has <gcServer 
>>> enabled="true" /> in its app.config.
>>>
>>> What could be the cause for such memory leak ?
>>> Has anybody also experienced such problems ?
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "nhusers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/nhusers.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/nhusers.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to