That's all the information I need, thanks for taking the time to answer my 
questions.

On Monday, January 25, 2021 at 3:14:20 PM UTC-5 Frédéric Delaporte wrote:

> Yes, see the nhibernate-development discussion about this 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/nhibernate-development/c/lhNOJuUatWA>.
>
> Le lundi 25 janvier 2021 à 21:10:06 UTC+1, [email protected] a écrit :
>
>> Thanks for the response!  Do you know if we are under the correct 
>> assumption that ownership of the Fluent-NHibernate repo has been taken over 
>> the by NHibernate team?
>>
>> On Friday, January 22, 2021 at 3:01:51 PM UTC-5 Frédéric Delaporte wrote:
>>
>>> There is no preferred method. It depends on your projects needs, on your 
>>> team preferences, ...
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 22 janvier 2021 à 20:59:42 UTC+1, [email protected] a 
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There are two options for code based mapping for NHibernate that I'm 
>>>> aware of.  We can use the built in NHibernate.Mapping.ByCode or use 
>>>> Fluent-Nhibernate.  I had, for many years, used Fluent-Nhibernate, but 
>>>> that 
>>>> project went unmaintained for a long period of time.  So long, that I 
>>>> assumed it was dead and started using NHibernate.Mapping.ByCode for new 
>>>> projects.  Recently, I noticed that Fluent-Nhibernate published a new 
>>>> package and is also now part of the Nhibernate repository.
>>>>
>>>> I would love to know, especially from someone in the NHibernate team, 
>>>> what's the current preferred method for code based mapping?  Both methods 
>>>> have advantages, but documentation on the built in mapping by code is 
>>>> limited and spare.
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/nhusers/e38bd380-215d-4fa2-a474-91e9756f6b05n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to