Sounds like you're doing fine and your bike is responding as it  
should.  It's not a 750 single which would bounce you off the line,  
or propel you with a more rocket like take off but then your 750 four  
would overtake the single pretty quick.  I had a 650 single long time  
ago that had amazing initial take off but didn't have the  
acceleration of a twin or four after 3.k - 3.5.00k rpms.

On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:22 PM, mhillard wrote:

>
> Can you provide more detail on what you mean by "taking off too
> slow"?  I wouldn't say that mine is slow, but I guess it might be if
> you were comparing it to something like launching an F-18 off of the
> deck of an aircraft carrier (which jumps the aircraft from 0 to about
> 140 in about 1.5 seconds).  Joking aside, if I start out in first and
> give it a normal amount of throttle (defined as no wheelies or
> spinning rear tires), it will accelerate through first evenly and
> rather quickly (guessing in maybe 30 yards or so).  I also don't wind
> it out too far, typically changing gears in the 4000 to 5000 rpm range
> (I think... I've never paid close attention to rpm's, as I use sound
> not gauges).
>
> - Matt
>
> On Sep 10, 12:51 pm, Angela Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> what about the bike taking off too slow? Do any off you guys have  
>> that issue
>> and is that normal
>> or is it just me? ;-) maybe I should be taking off in 2nd gear more??
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Javier Garcia  
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I also have a very similar starting process on my '96 750. I  
>>> haven't take
>>> the times, but I don't think it takes me 5-7 min, but much less  
>>> than that.
>>> In fact, for morning temperatures above 70F, I do not need choke  
>>> at all the
>>> first 5 seconds: it does start right away, but after few seconds  
>>> the rpm's
>>> keep going down and if I let go it will stall. So I just give  
>>> about half
>>> choke to keep the rpm's stable and that is.
>>> Now in past few days I can't do this anymore since morning temps are
>>> getting a little bit below 70F (I guess the same where you are  
>>> Matt).
>>> However, I still use half choke to start, and for the time I put  
>>> my helmet
>>> and gloves on it is ready for rock n' roll.
>>
>>> Javier.
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Graham Rogers <[email protected]>  
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Mine's about the same ('02 750).  I start it the same way - full
>>>> choke, no throttle, it starts at the touch of the button.  When  
>>>> revs
>>>> climb to about 3k I start dropping the choke back till it idles
>>>> without the choke (about 5 to 7 minutes) and then I can go.  Even
>>>> then I may have to give it a little choke for the first mile or two
>>>> unless I'm going straight out onto the open road.
>>>> Mine is never ready from cold within seconds.  My 700 is however,
>>>> very different,  Graham
>>
>>>> On Sep 10, 2009, at 8:26 AM, mhillard wrote:
>>
>>>>> I practice a starting regimine very similar to what surfswab just
>>>>> detailed but my '03 750 takes minutes, not seconds, to be actually
>>>>> "ride ready".  When it's cold, I turn the choke to full-on and the
>>>>> bike will start with very little cranking (and no throttle).  I  
>>>>> let it
>>>>> idle at full-choke until the rpm's climb to about 3000, then  
>>>>> move it
>>>>> to half- choke.  The idle speed will drop back down, then  
>>>>> slowly climb
>>>>> up again.  Once the rpm's hit around 2500 a second time the  
>>>>> bike is
>>>>> ready to go.  I've never timed it, but I would say the whole  
>>>>> process
>>>>> takes 5 to 7 minutes.  But that's also about how long it takes  
>>>>> me to
>>>>> get my riding gear on and the gates opened at my house, so when  
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> ready the bike is.  It seems that anything less causes the bike to
>>>>> barely want to move.  If you drop it into first and give it  
>>>>> throttle,
>>>>> the engine sounds like it's about to stall out when you start  
>>>>> to let
>>>>> the clutch out.  I may be wrong, but I thought this was just a
>>>>> characteristic of the Nighthawks.  I've got less than 4K miles  
>>>>> on it,
>>>>> and otherwise it runs well.
>>
>>>>> - mhillard- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> >
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Nighthawk Motorcycle Lovers!" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nighthawk_lovers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to