> But is it slow actually? Yes.
> Isn't Java works that way - everything except of primitive types like int is > ref? True. > And Java is fast. No. > Yes Java may be slower compared to C in benchmark numbers. But for any > practical case - Java performance will be more than enough for most cases. This is simply an assertion that it doesn't matter that it's slow, or that it's not slow enough to matter. > So how could you call that slow? By being factual, rather than indulging in circular reasoning and sophistry.
